A Carolina Hurricanes blog with occasional news about the rest of the NHL.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Oilers win game 3, trail series 2-1

On Saturday night, Edmonton did what they had to do. They played a well-rounded game, avoided penalty trouble, and ultimately, were better than the Canes. In a game that looked to be headed to overtime, they got a late goal that was a little less than gorgeous, but an ugly game-winning goal is still a game-winning goal.

At 2:31 of the first, Shawn Horcoff got the Oil out to a 1-0 lead. It was the first goal they'd scored since the 13:31 mark of the third period in game one. Exactly 69 minutes. Jaro Spacek fired a shot from the blue line, which appeared to go straight in. However, Horcoff had a very slight re-direction from the low slot, nudging it through Cam Ward's five hole. Ales Hemsky got the second assist. Even with the redirect, it was a shot that should have been stopped.

The remainder of the first, and the entire second period was kind of quiet. There were a handful of penalties to each team. Each side received some questionable calls, and in the end it evened out. I still don't think Macgeough should be out there. I'll admit I had a wrong preconception of him as a good ref. In game one he certainly proved otherwise. Although he wasn't horrible in game 3, he was less than "good".

About midway through the first, Justin Williams had a fantastic breakaway chance, but his attempt to go to the upper right corner of the net was foiled. Markkanen got just enough of it with his glove to prevent a goal, sending the puck over the net.

Rod Brind'Amour leveled the score at the 9:09 mark of the third. Cory Stillman worked behind the net, getting the puck to Brindy in the left circle. He attempted a shot, which was blocked by Jason Smith, but bounced right back to Brindy. He finally got a shot through, and it beat Markkanen high on the stick side. Stillman got the only assist, and extended his playoff scoring streak to 11 games.

With the period winding down, Ryan Smyth got the game winner on a somewhat controversial goal. Smyth weaved his way through a rather lax defense and went to the net. He took a shot that was initially blocked by Cam Ward, but the rebound glanced off Smyth, who was by now well inside the crease (practically inside the goal) and past Ward. Although there wasn't any significant contact with the goaltender, the argument was that Smyth interfered with the goalie's ability to defend his crease. Rule 78g:
If an attacking player establishes a significant position within the goal crease, so as to obstruct the goalkeeper's vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.
After a bit of a review, the officials declared the goal to be good. Hemsky and Spacek with the assists.

Carolina can't feel too bad about that, though. Late in the second, Ethan Moreau seemed to have scored a goal. He had created a turnover deep in the Carolina zone, and took several point blank shots on Ward. Referee Mcgeough lost sight of the puck and blew the whistle. Just after the whistle, Moreau took another whack at it, sending it past Ward. Although the light went off and the horn sounded, the goal was immediately wiped off. If the puck was under Ward, it was only for a fraction of a second, and I guess that's what Mcgeough saw. No goal. It was a great break for Carolina on a really short whistle. One of many times that Mcgeough made questionable calls in this game. Also remember that in game one, he made some questionable calls, including the penalty shot play. I don't know how he saw the puck the whole time on that one, and lost the puck on this one.

All in all, Carolina wasn't terrible, but wasn't great. They had a load of scoring chances that didn't go that well. A few shots directly at Markkanen, a few bad shots, a few bad passes. Markkanen was amazing, though. The "save" on the breakaway was pretty nice, and he saw a lot of shots late in the third. On the other end, I don't think anyone can take anything away from Cam Ward either. He made some sizzling saves, and stayed very well focused in his homecoming.

All three goals were even, full-strength goals. Carolina killed off seven penalties, including 1:27 of five-on-three. Edmonton killed off five penalties. Neither team was really able to do much on their respective power play.

Although I didn't like the outcome, it really was a great game. Highly entertaining. Great goaltending on both ends. Good defense on both ends. And clean.

I watched the game at my friend Bill's house. He acquired a high-def projection system, and projected the game on his garage door. That was a lot of fun. I recommend it for everyone.

Game four will be Monday with an 8:00 puck drop. No matter what happens in that game, Carolina will still have "home ice". Edmonton, by the way, did a great job of using home ice to their advantage. They made the right "last change" line changes, ensuring that they always had the right personnel. This, frankly, is something that Carolina hasn't really used to their advantage so far.

One statistic definitely worth mentioning is that Rod Brind'Amour only won 37% of his faceoffs. Shawn Horcoff, on the other hand, was on fire. He won 61% of his, including three of his four defensive zone draws. I would expect those numbers to be closer to 50% for each guy in game 4. Something else worth noting is that Georges Laraque, after playing the role of villain in game 2, was only given 24 seconds of ice time in game 3. From the looks of the shift chart, he had two shifts of seven seconds each in the first period, and one ten-second shift in the second. Nothing in the third.

One question I have for Edmonton fans. This is a serious question. Why was Doug Weight booed so lustily by the Oiler fans every time he touched the puck? I was under the impression that he was a fan favorite when he was there and that he left without dishonoring the team. Is there something I don't know about that he did on his way out the door?

Game 4 Monday night. Have fun.


sacamano said...

Gretzky got booed when he first came back to town. It is somewhat of a sign of respect. Unless you are Mike Comrie, in which case the booing is legit.

room4spirit said...

i'm very upset that the refs allowed that game winning goal but at the same time you can't blame the refs for everything. carolina should have scored more. i was kind of hoping for them to win games 3 and 4 and then be able to head to the airport after tomorrow night's game but the possible winning of the stanley cup on home ice would be about the most amazing thing!!!! so all i have to say is go canes and win it for eric and for glen wesley (b/c he has played the most playoff games without winning a cup and seeing as this could be his last year i say win it for glen wesley). also, just a reminder to those that the rbc center will be open on monday night. i believe gates and doors open at seven. GO CANES!!!!

Desdemona said...

How do you do a commentary on the entire game without mentioning the gift-wrapped Hurricane gift? (also know as the non-Moreau goal)

d-lee said...

yeah.... sorry 'bout that. I'll take a few minutes to go back and edit that in. I was taking notes in the pitch dark last night, and I put the post up in a hurry. Really, I couldn't remember at which point in the game it took place, and I wanted to get that right.

Chris said...

These calls happen. It has happened against us several times in the playoffs, and now once for us. I don't think that's a big deal. If the ref loses sight, he loses sight and is right to blow the whistle. Nothing you can do about it. *shrug*

Andy Grabia said...

Forget Rule 78g. A player is allowed to pursue a loose puck in the crease. If Cammy Rebound had held on to the puck, the goal wouldn't have been allowed. Didn't Joe Camel score a goal like that against the Habs in the first round? I believe he did. I am sorry, but these guys are babies. The Moreau goal got called back when it shouldn't have, so really there are just lucky the final score wasn't 3-1. Ward's also lucky he didn't end up like Roloson. In the paper in Edmonton today, Aaron Ward is quoted as saying that he should have pushed Smyth into his goalie rather than letting him go cleanly through the crease. He's probably right. The refs probably would have disallowed the goal, even though the push on Smyth would have been illegal.

swabbubba said...

Not bad.. you look at 78 i though... We always boo players that leave the team. If they get traded not so much. And the hate for the guy named Comrie is deserved.
I think the series is getting better as the hate for each other develops...

Bill Purdy said...

I'm thinking bout projecting the game on my garage again tomorrow night. Anyone wanna come?

Brushback said...

Rule 78 has some pretty long-ass text to it. As someone else pointed out above, you need to continue reading down to section "i":

In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and offensive player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

I believe that Ward made the initial save, but then the rebound bounced off Smyth and into the net.

d-lee said...

Indeed that is long.

Clearly it was a rebound situation, and clearly the contact wasn't the issue. Clearly, however, section i of the rule makes the goal good. Like I said, I wasn't really myself questioning the validity of the goal. I was just trying to sort out what their complaint was.

Seriously, I don't think that the "contact" was the issue.

Doesn't matter anyway. The goal was good. Ultimately, I think Frantisek Kaberle was lazy on that play and could have kept Smyth out of there.

Tomorrow's a new day, and a new game.

Win or lose, I hope there isn't any controversy, and I hope the Canes players handle the pressers a little better.

d-lee said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DrFrankLives said...

who cares if they wanted to talk to the 50 otherwise out of work Canadian reporters who were sitting in the press room?

They're all cheering for the Oilers anyway. Have you listened to XM lately?

I got on there yesterday and asked them when they were going to chagnge the name to "Oilers Satellite Radio"

Personally, I'm glad Rod basically treated them like crap. They deserve it.

I dont care if he never talks to the press as long as he scores goals.

Now, if anyone has seen Eric Staal, please wake him up and drive him to the rink. He's slept through the last several games and someone else is wearing his uniform

Chris! said...

Frank, you're the wind beneath my wings.

Brian said...

This is how I've always figured the series would play out:

Canes win 1 & 2 at home, lose 3 on the road, win 4 at Edmonton and raise the Cup in Raleigh after game 5.

I'm sticking by that...


Red And Black Hockey is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Carolina Hurricanes Hockey Club, the National Hockey League or any of its other member clubs. The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of RBH. Any comments made are the opinion of the commenter, and not necessarily that of RBH.
Whenever possible, RBH uses its own photography. Any incidental use of copyrighted material including photography, logos or other brand markings will not interfere with the owner's profits.