A Carolina Hurricanes blog with occasional news about the rest of the NHL.

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

don't believe the talk

I've been sitting on this half-written post for a few days. I couldn't decide whether to post it or not, and finally I opted to go ahead with it. I'll apologize in advance if it seems like idle ranting.....

I make it a rule NOT to visit Eklund's site. Ever. I haven't read anything from him in probably a year.

A few days ago, I got an e-mail inquiry from a reader concerning a resurrected rumor that the Canes would be trading the rights to defenseman Jack Johnson to the Penguins in exchange for Jordan Staal. The e-mail started with the question "Did you see this one on Eklund's site today?". Of course I snickered and started to imagine in my head what his "expert" "insider" information on this was.

"Eklund" wrote a piece, essentially saying that it's a no-brainer for both sides because Carolina has an overabundance of defense and Pittsburgh only needs two forwards (Crosby and Malkin). He went on to say that according to his insider information, the deal was already in the works and they were just "waiting out the holiday" to make it happen. Now we all (at least the ones of us who are at all savvy) know that the "insiders" that Dwayne Kessel "Eklund" refers to are
  • his dog
  • his deranged uncle who lives in the attic and writes love poems to Mamie Eisenhower
  • a life-size cardboard cutout of those Bartles & James guys
  • the best friend of his eight-year-old nephew's classmate's next door neighbor
  • his co-worker Pete, who played intramural hockey in college


Still, though, this rumor has managed to gain some momentum and has all the message board types drooling. They're looking at this prospect of a trade in terms of how it would work in the here and now. They're mistaking Johnson's quest for an NCAA championship for Eli Manning-esque petulance. They look at our current roster and say "We don't need another defenseman. Ever. Especially if he refuses to play for us"

While Carolina is in good shape defense-wise this season, they need to retain the rights to Johnson. By the time he leaves Ann Arbor (whether it's the spring of '07 or the spring of '09), the 87 year old Glen Wesley will have retired, and Bret Hedican will probably do the same. Honestly, I'm quite surprised that Wesley didn't already retire after winning the Cup. Hedican, who is held together with duct tape and Bondo, will be lucky to make it through this upcoming season. I half expected him to retire as well. After the 06-07 season, the timing will be just right for Jack Johnson to make the jump and fill Carolina's defensive needs.

A defenseman of his calibre doesn't come around very often. Good defensemen, by anybody's account, are much harder to come across than forwards. Eklund seems to be suggesting that since the Canes signed David Tanabe to a one year deal, they no longer need the best defensive prospect this franchise has ever seen. The mouth breathing masses are gobbling it up.

Would I like to see Jordan Staal play for Carolina? Sure. Does this trade talk make sense? Maybe it did back in June, but I guess I've changed my mind.

Please note that I'm aware of the fact that I once was of the camp that favored the idea of a draft day trade involving the same thing. I'm also aware of the fact that I once (with tongue planted in cheek) ridiculed Johnson's decision to go to school. I've changed though. I've gone 180 on that, and I think it's cool that he's serious about going to school and playing college hockey. It was his boyhood dream to play hockey for the Wolverines and to win an NCAA championship doing it. He's living part of that dream. And as far as the Canes are concerned, they'll still have his rights while he's in college. He'll be developing and the Canes won't have to pay him a dime while he's doing it. It's kind of a good deal.

Oh, and just for good measure, here's a Jack Johnson clip you might not have seen:




Slots still available in my fantasy hockey league. Scroll down to previous posts for details.

3 comments:

tj said...

You're right.

A Johnson for Staal trade would be a feel-good trade, but not a good hockey trade. The Canes will be lucky to get through this season with the aging defensive corps we have. Tanabe's acquisition is indicative of our lack of defensive depth. To say that he is a replacement for Johnson is crazy; we're taking a flyer on a player that has not lived up to his potential since his first two seasons in the league.

I think Jim Rutherford learned his lesson about letting emotions rule hockey deals. He did that after the 2002 Cup Finals run and the next season we were dead last in the league. He's acknowledged this publically. Let's hope he sticks to his guns and realizes that keeping Johnson is the best thing for the organization.

nuts4pucks said...

I'm glad to hear someone shares my opinion about JJ. I don't get the haters who think that he's dissing the 'Canes organization by opting to stay in college. That's one of the beautiful things about the NHL draft. These kids can stay in college, develop and mature, and when they make the jump to pro, it is because they are ready and their pro teams agree that they are ready. If he can learn some discipline without losing the snarl in his game, it will be a good thing all around. I'm willing to wait.

CasonBlog said...

Should have led with the video clip. You had me at the slapper.

disclaimer

Red And Black Hockey is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Carolina Hurricanes Hockey Club, the National Hockey League or any of its other member clubs. The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of RBH. Any comments made are the opinion of the commenter, and not necessarily that of RBH.
Whenever possible, RBH uses its own photography. Any incidental use of copyrighted material including photography, logos or other brand markings will not interfere with the owner's profits.